SESSION-BY-SESSION ANALYSIS
NEMBC Day 1: What Eighteen Sessions Actually Mean for the Market
A working analysis of the New England Mortgage Bankers Conference's Tech + Leadership Summit — not a recap of what was said, but a read on why it matters and what it should change at your own company.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — FIVE THREADS THAT RAN ACROSS THE WHOLE DAY
The patterns no single session named out loud
- Channel migration is accelerating, not stabilizing. Broker and non-delegated correspondent volume is taking share from both IMBs and, increasingly, banks — a trend three separate panels described independently without being asked about it directly.
- The AI maturity gap is becoming a real moat. Most organizations represented in the room are still at "assistance" — faster execution of the same work. A handful of operators are already at "orchestration." That gap compounds.
- Retention and culture are now balance-sheet questions, not HR ones. Multiple leaders independently described cutting a talented-but-toxic performer and watching output accelerate — "addition by subtraction" wasn't a one-off line, it was a pattern.
- Recruiting has become explicit, transactional B2B sales. The language shifted openly from relationship-building to funnel-building: define the avatar, build the offer, run the content pipeline.
- The cost of building proprietary technology has collapsed. A production LOS core built in a week on $40,000 of credits is a different competitive reality than the one most lenders are still planning around.
THE FULL RECORDINGS
Every session was recorded. Get all of them — and get ahead of next year too.
Each session below has its own sign-up, or join the full list here and unlock every recording in one go. Either way you're on the list for presale access, lineup alerts, and private online chats with speakers.
You'll also get the first alert on next year's date and location, plus hotel price tracking as room blocks release. Last year's Marriott block sold out in a single day — the more we know about demand ahead of time, the more room blocks we can lock in elsewhere at better pricing, so it's actually easier for you to get a room.
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch any session now:
CONTENTS
- 01Build a Chief of Staff Before Your Coffee Gets Cold8:00 AM
- 02The ADU Opportunity9:00 AM
- 03Marketing for Market Share9:30 AM
- 04The New Brand of CEO: Leading and Recruiting in Public10:00 AM
- 05What's Your Story? Leading With the Human Moment10:20 AM
- 06Bank Lending in 202610:50 AM
- 07The Workflow Revolution11:25 AM
- 08Ron Klabunde & Mike Eising11:50 AM
- 09The Blueprint for Success: How Top Wholesalers Are Winning the Market1:00 PM
- 10Better Teammates = Better Business1:25 PM
- 11The Pipeline Problem: Building a Purchase-First Origination Machine1:50 PM
- 12The Convergence of Community, Connection & Culture2:15 PM
- 13Beyond the Tech Stack: The C-Suite Decisions That Will Define Mortgage's Next Winners2:40 PM
- 14The Technology Bet: Building the Mortgage Company Loan Officers Will Choose3:15 PM
- 15Recruiting Top Loan Officers: Strategies That Actually Work3:40 PM
- 16Clicks to Closings: 2 CEOs on the Tech That's Actually Moving the Needle4:05 PM
- 17Culture Is the Strategy: Building Teams That Outlast Market Cycles4:30 PM
- 18Evening EventEvening
Build a Chief of Staff Before Your Coffee Gets Cold
The day opened with a live build: an AI agent constructed from scratch in Claude, then extended into a small team of agents that report to each other — framed around mortgage workflows specifically, not abstract AI capability.
Why it matters for the market
Most lenders' AI usage today is still single-task: draft this email, summarize this call. What got demonstrated here — agents coordinating across a fragmented ecosystem of consumer, agent, lender, underwriting, title, insurance, and closing — is a capability tier ahead of where the market operates. The gap between a lender who can build this internally and one who can only buy pre-packaged point solutions is becoming a real competitive difference, not a hypothetical one.
Questions for your leadership
- Does anyone on our team have the technical fluency to build what was demonstrated here, or are we entirely dependent on vendor roadmaps for our AI capability?
- When agent orchestration becomes table stakes rather than a novelty, what's our plan to not be two years behind?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Ahead of this recording — covered here from the published session description, not the tape.
The ADU Opportunity
Michael Kelleher opened solo, walking through how he used Claude Code to build an accessory-dwelling-unit platform from scratch off Massachusetts' new ADU legislation — a regulatory shift almost nobody in the room was tracking, turned into a working purchase-lead source.
Why it matters for the market
Legislative and zoning shifts create narrow windows where whoever moves first captures disproportionate share before the opportunity gets commoditized by everyone else noticing. ADU legislation specifically taps the supply side of the affordability problem this entire day kept circling back to — building more housing where owners already hold the land, rather than waiting on new construction.
Questions for your leadership
- What state or local legislative changes in our own footprint are we not yet building a product or content strategy around?
- Who actually owns 'watch for new legislation' as a job function at our company — or does no one?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Also ahead of the recording — summarized from the published agenda.
Marketing for Market Share
Drew Gillett walked through Guild's own AI platform, Guild IQ — built on top of the major models, wired into internal systems, with data safeguards designed in from the start. James Duncan then gave the room a clean diagnostic: three AI maturity levels — assistance (faster execution), intelligence (surfacing opportunities a human wouldn't find), orchestration (embedded deep enough that it's just how the org works) — plus a live example of a level-one marketing prompt versus a level-two one, and what separates them.
A second thread ran through the session: one panelist's audit of their own borrower communications found six different SMS platforms touching the same client during a single transaction, none of them coordinated.
Why it matters for the market
The maturity framework is useful precisely because most marketing AI spend right now sits at level one — using AI to produce the same mediocre ideas faster, not better ideas. The SMS-sprawl story is the more important cautionary tale: it's evidence that operational debt accumulates invisibly as an org scales, and nobody notices until someone actually audits the borrower's actual experience rather than each department's individual tool.
Questions for your leadership
- If we mapped every touchpoint a borrower receives after application, would we find our own version of six uncoordinated numbers?
- Where in our marketing stack are we optimizing for output volume — more posts, more emails — instead of the business outcome that volume is supposed to produce?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
The New Brand of CEO: Leading and Recruiting in Public
Dylan Latour's argument: a loan officer owns the revenue they originate, so LO churn is revenue churn, and recruiting a producer is functionally a six- or seven-figure purchase decision. His playbook: define your recruiting avatar from your actual five-to-ten best producers rather than a generic 'entrepreneurial go-getter,' build an offer around dream outcome, probability of success, time delay, and effort/sacrifice, then run a public content funnel — one LinkedIn post per pillar, four days a week — that sells a producer before the first call happens.
Why it matters for the market
This is the practical end-state of a market where organic origination growth is harder to manufacture than simply winning someone else's producer. As that fight intensifies, it's increasingly happening in public rather than through private backchannel relationships — which changes what 'recruiting' actually requires a company to invest in: not a bigger recruiting team, but a leadership team willing to publish.
Questions for your leadership
- Does our own leadership publish anything that would actually move a producer to DM us, or are we relying entirely on inbound cold outreach from a recruiter?
- Do we actually know our avatar — the real, specific profile of our best five producers — well enough to recruit against it deliberately, rather than generically?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
What's Your Story? Leading With the Human Moment
Meghan Handy opened with a story she'd never told publicly in 22 years — a title-search mistake on Christmas Eve 2004 that nearly cost a family their closing — to make a sharper point about the difference between posts full of 'ands' (closed loans, happy families, thank-yous) and posts with a 'but,' which are the only ones a reader's brain actually leans into. Her framework — Hook/Hero, Obstacle, Mentor, Emotional ending — makes a specific claim: in your own story, you are never the hero. The hero is whoever's reading.
Why it matters for the market
In a market this commoditized on rate, the real differentiator is trust-signal density, and storytelling is the cheapest way to manufacture that signal without buying it through paid acquisition. Most loan officer content today is undifferentiated 'just closed' noise — which is exactly why a session built around the opposite of that pattern generated the most visible reaction in the room all day.
Questions for your leadership
- Does our content calendar actually produce anything with an obstacle in it, or are we only permitted to publish good news?
- Who on our team is genuinely good at telling a story, and do they currently have a platform to do it on?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Bank Lending in 2026
The panel's consensus: banks don't treat mortgage as a standalone profit center — it's the front door to a lifetime relationship, and customers now expect the same Amazon Prime-grade experience from their bank they get everywhere else. The harder conversation was credit modernization: real appetite for better underwriting data, matched by real concern that an easy near-term win could reopen the door to score gaming if the industry doesn't get the risk pricing right underneath it. Underneath both topics sat the same conclusion — data quality, not AI and not the LOS, is the actual gating problem.
Why it matters for the market
Banks sitting cautious on AI adoption while IMBs and correspondents sprint ahead is a structural advantage banks are quietly giving away. Their cost of funds should make them the biggest long-term winners from AI-driven efficiency — but caution, however justified by regulatory exposure, is ceding the technology gap to less-regulated competitors who don't carry the same constraints.
Questions for your leadership
- If our depository competitors are laggards on AI by their own admission, is that our opening — and do we actually have the balance sheet to exploit it before they close the gap?
- What's our institution's real position on credit modernization — opportunity or risk — and have we modeled it, or are we just watching?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
The Workflow Revolution
David Alonzo laid out Union Home's crawl-walk-run model: understand what data a task actually needs, understand why that data gets collected, only then automate the action. Nate Longfellow's version starts from decision points — decompose the process into every decision that has to get made, find the data behind each one, then reserve the leaner team for the exceptions AI can't handle. The concrete number of the session: TD's processors were spending roughly 70 minutes per loan just preparing for a single customer call, reconstructing context that already existed somewhere in the file.
Why it matters for the market
That 70-minute figure is a proxy for a much larger, mostly invisible tax every lender pays in context-reconstruction work spread across the transaction. Both panelists converged independently on the same principle without comparing notes beforehand: decompose to decisions and data first, automate the deterministic parts, and keep AI in exceptions rather than the credit decision itself — which also happens to be the pattern regulators are most likely to accept first.
Questions for your leadership
- Do we actually know how much time our own team spends reconstructing context before every customer interaction, or would we have to go measure it to find out?
- Is our workflow automation being built from a decisions-and-data model, or are we just bolting AI onto a process that was already broken?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Ron Klabunde & Mike Eising
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
No transcript for these two — the written analysis above wasn't built from the tape, but both recordings are available below.
The Blueprint for Success: How Top Wholesalers Are Winning the Market
The panel's position: winning brokers can't pick one of service, price, or technology — they have to win all three every day, because brokers compare notes and the moment any leg slips, the loan goes elsewhere. One panelist's firm grew from roughly $80M to $650M a month post-acquisition while growing headcount only a third as fast, purely through technology leverage — paired with a deliberate decision to keep the human communication layer separate and protected rather than automating it away. On pricing, the operating principle was 'no bips left behind' — pass through every basis point of execution advantage rather than bank margin on loans that go elsewhere anyway.
Why it matters for the market
The wholesale channel's growth — broker and non-delegated correspondent taking share from both IMBs and now banks — is the clearest channel-migration story in the numbers discussed across the whole day. 'No bips left behind' pricing discipline is precisely what makes that channel structurally difficult for a higher-overhead retail model to beat on price alone; it's a cost-structure advantage, not a marketing one.
Questions for your leadership
- If our channel is losing share to wholesale and broker, is the right answer more marketing, or an honest rethink of our own cost structure?
- Could we actually sustain 'no bips left behind' pricing discipline today, or are we protecting margin at the cost of volume we can no longer afford to lose?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Better Teammates = Better Business
The most candid leadership exchange of the day. One panelist described a quarterly ritual: ten to twelve frontline processors and underwriters in a room with no managers present, asked one question — if you had a magic wand, what would you change about your job? The first answers are always the polished, corporate ones; the real ones come only after the leader pushes past them. Another leaned on the Stockdale Paradox — confront the brutal facts of a margin-compressed market while staying certain you'll ultimately prevail — and argued the strongest vendor partnerships get built through the disagreement nobody wanted to have out loud, not around it.
Why it matters for the market
The no-managers-in-the-room technique is a structural fix for a problem most organizations solve badly: leadership hearing what it wants to hear rather than what's actually broken. That information gap compounds directly into the fulfillment cost and cycle-time problems raised two sessions later — teams can't fix friction leadership never actually heard about.
Questions for your leadership
- When did we last get an unfiltered answer from frontline staff, without a manager in the room shaping the response?
- What friction is our team not telling us about, simply because nobody's ever asked in a way that made it safe to say?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
The Pipeline Problem: Building a Purchase-First Origination Machine
Purchase share jumped from roughly 50–59% in 2021 to 82–87% today across every panelist's book. The strategy that came up repeatedly wasn't generating more leads — it was keeping the leads already coming in, by expanding the product box (non-QM, DSCR, bridge, HELOC) so an LO can say yes to the deal already in front of them instead of turning it away. A recurring, uncomfortable stat: 70% of recent buyers describe the mortgage transaction itself as a hassle — and the panel's read was that this is often a technology-integration failure wearing a mortgage costume, not an unsolvable structural problem.
Why it matters for the market
The purchase-share swing means almost every lender's operating model, built for refi-era volume, is now running against its own design. Expanding the product box is a retention-of-existing-demand strategy rather than a demand-generation one — meaningfully cheaper to execute in a flat-to-shrinking purchase market than trying to manufacture more leads from scratch.
Questions for your leadership
- How much of our current pipeline loss is really a 'wrong product for this borrower' problem rather than a 'not enough leads' problem?
- Do our LOs actually have non-QM, DSCR, or bridge tools available today, or do they have to turn away the deal in front of them?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
The Convergence of Community, Connection & Culture
The most talked-about session of the day. Jeremy Ray Davis built his talk around three unlikely teachers from his own childhood — the barbershop, the pulpit, the corner store — mapping them to presence, purpose, and proximity as the three things a team actually needs from a leader. The practical system underneath the emotion: weekly unscripted chats with no agenda, monthly handwritten notes for birthdays and anniversaries, and quarterly personal letters of gratitude mailed to a team member's spouse. He credited the system with near-zero turnover across three and a half years.
Why it matters for the market
Retention-by-culture is becoming a genuine competitive moat in a market where compensation alone can't consistently win a bidding war against better-capitalized competitors. A near-zero-turnover claim, if it holds, represents a real cost advantage most finance teams never actually model into unit economics — turnover cost is treated as an HR line item rather than a strategic one.
Questions for your leadership
- Would our own leadership survive a no-managers-in-the-room session run the way this framework demands?
- What would our turnover number actually look like if we tracked — in dollars — the cost of not doing something like this?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Beyond the Tech Stack: The C-Suite Decisions That Will Define Mortgage's Next Winners
Ryan Grant reframed the industry's 'customer for life' debate directly: if a past client ever calls asking to buy, sell, or refinance, the relationship has already failed — a properly engaged originator would have told them when it was time, not waited to be called. The panel's broader point: technology represents less than 4% of the cost of a loan, so the decisions that actually separate winners are capital allocation, culture, and channel or product bets — not the next platform purchase. On the industry's low-producer problem, the math was blunt: personnel alone runs roughly $7,600 of total cost to originate, about 60% of it, which makes a one-loan-a-month originator a real tax on the organization whether or not it shows up on a spreadsheet.
Why it matters for the market
The 'technology is under 4% of cost' reframe is arguably the single most useful number of the day for any leadership team currently over-indexed on tooling decisions. It argues that capital allocation, culture, and channel bets matter far more to the P&L than the next platform purchase — a hard message to sell internally when vendors dominate every conference floor and every sales call.
Questions for your leadership
- Are we spending leadership attention in proportion to where the cost actually sits — 4% of cost getting 40% of the conversation?
- What's our real, numbers-backed position on retaining versus selling servicing, or are we just following habit?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
The Technology Bet: Building the Mortgage Company Loan Officers Will Choose
Rich Weidel's company banned the word 'training' — every recurring problem used to get a meeting and a PDF; now it gets a workflow. Three years in, he's eliminated the payroll department, the post-closing department, and automated rate-locking entirely, not by buying a bigger vendor contract but by building the fix in-house once the underlying data was finally clean. Scott Gannon offered the necessary counterweight: a 30-year client called him in tears, certain someone had filed fraudulent tax returns in her name; he pulled her credit report himself, on the phone, and found nothing wrong — a five-minute human reassurance no automated tool would have delivered the same way. His caution on AI at community-bank scale was equally direct: no borrower PII into a public model until someone else goes first and the bank's own AI policy clears its own safety exam.
Why it matters for the market
Weidel's build-it-yourself economics versus Gannon's justified caution is the clearest illustration all day of how differently the AI bet pays off depending on scale and regulatory exposure — there is no universal answer here, and that's itself the finding worth taking home.
Questions for your leadership
- At our scale, does the build-versus-buy math genuinely favor building, or are we chasing a strategy that only works two orders of magnitude bigger than us?
- What would have to be true about our own data quality before an AI policy like the one described here could actually pass our own safety and soundness review?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Recruiting Top Loan Officers: Strategies That Actually Work
The panel's sharpest reframe: you're no longer recruiting an individual, you're recruiting their workflow. A top producer arrives with their own CRM and their own way of working, and the fastest way to lose a strong candidate is to force a system rebuild instead of letting them plug in on day one. One panelist's own numbers: consolidating six separate ownership stakes into a single $1.3 billion platform by year end, up from roughly $200 million.
Why it matters for the market
This is the practical end-state of the LO-owns-the-revenue thesis raised earlier in the day. That data ownership is now the first question in nearly every recruiting conversation — not the fifth or the tenth — signals the industry converging on a genuinely new normal around originator portability that most comp plans and tech stacks still aren't built to accommodate.
Questions for your leadership
- Can a producer actually plug their own CRM and tools into our platform today, or do we force a rebuild that costs us the best candidates before they even start?
- What data-ownership commitment are we actually prepared to put in writing during a recruiting conversation?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Clicks to Closings: 2 CEOs on the Tech That's Actually Moving the Needle
The best origin story of the day. Greg Schwartz's team received $40,000 in free Claude credits through an Anthropic startup program, handed them to one senior engineer, and told him to disappear for a week. He came back with a working first version of an entirely new loan operating system — rough front end, no security packaging yet, not launchable, but a genuine LOS core built in a week instead of the three or four years it would have taken previously. The team is now targeting a production version in three months with two engineers. Justin Messer's Prosperity runs the opposite model — deeply embedded in a large real estate network, using servicing as a years-later touchpoint to earn the next referral back to an agent. Both agreed the actual affordability lever is supply, not manufacturing cost, which barely moves the number no matter how much is squeezed out of it.
Why it matters for the market
A week-long, $40,000-credit build of a working LOS core is genuine evidence that the cost of building proprietary technology has collapsed by roughly an order of magnitude. That changes the competitive calculus for any mid-size lender still assuming custom tooling is only a mega-lender's game.
Questions for your leadership
- If a small engineering team can stand up a working LOS core in a week, what exactly are we still paying a legacy multi-year vendor contract for?
- Have we actually tested what our own team could build in a week with today's tools, or are we assuming the answer without checking?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Culture Is the Strategy: Building Teams That Outlast Market Cycles
The closing panel's definition of culture — from Eric Roman, and the line people kept repeating in the hallway afterward — was that culture is what people do when leadership isn't in the room. Every panelist described some version of 'addition by subtraction': cutting a talented but toxic top producer and watching the whole team accelerate afterward, faster than projected. Rob Jewett's team runs a 'Kudos Corner' recognition channel that took off harder internally than anyone expected. Chrissy Zotzmann Brown's closing note tied it together — money will always get outbid by a bigger check somewhere else; culture is what keeps someone from taking it.
Why it matters for the market
'Addition by subtraction' showing up independently across three unrelated panels — COOs, wholesalers, leadership — over the course of one day suggests a real pattern rather than a one-off anecdote: in a margin-compressed market, the visible cost of protecting a talented-but-toxic performer now outweighs the revenue risk of losing them, and more leadership teams are finally acting on that math instead of just discussing it.
Questions for your leadership
- Do we have an honest 'who would we cut' list, and if so, why hasn't it happened yet?
- What's actually costing us more right now — the risk of losing a top producer, or the cost of the damage they're doing to everyone around them while we keep them?
Watch this session
- Instant access to this session's recording
- Presale access to next year's conference
- Alerts as next year's lineup is announced
- Invitations to private online chats with speakers
You're on the list.
Presale access, next year's alerts, and speaker chat invites will come to the email you gave us. Watch now:
Evening Event
Announced separately — check the official NEMBC schedule for the latest.
CLOSING NOTE
The through-line
Taken individually, these are eighteen unrelated sessions on eighteen different topics. Taken together, they describe one market in the middle of the same transition from several different vantage points at once: origination volume moving toward channels with structurally lower cost, AI capability separating operators who can build from those who can only buy, and culture quietly becoming a line item every P&L will eventually have to account for whether or not it's labeled that way today.
The honest test of this document isn't whether it's a good read. It's whether any of the questions above actually got asked in a leadership meeting this quarter.
↑ Back to the top to join the list and unlock every recording
Analysis prepared from the day's recordings and the published NEMBC agenda. Corrections and additional context welcome.